Infamy: Pearl Harbor and its Aftermath PDF × Harbor

Infamy: Pearl Harbor and its Aftermath The controversial, best selling investigation of the events surrounding Pearl Harbor acclaimed as a shocking account of judgments distorted by politics career hunger racism fascinating reading LA Times Tangled web How did they catch us with our pants down, Mr President Mr Knox goes west Some admiral or some general in the Pacific may be made the goat Herbert HooverSettle yourself in a quiet nook somewhere let old father time help this entire situation Stark to KimmelPandora s boxMutiny on the second deckThe Hart inquiry The Army Navy club You do not have to carry the torch for Admiral KimmelCongress dances If I had known what was to happenI would have never have allowed myself to be tagged Wm D MitchellTheir day in court Safford at bay To throw as soft a light as possible on the Washington sceneThe Tenth investigation Operation Z The Tracking of Kido Butai Date of infamy But they knew, they knew, they knew The Summing up


About the Author: John Toland

John Willard Toland June 29, 1912 in La Crosse, Wisconsin January 4, 2004 in Danbury, Connecticut was an American author and historian He is best known for his biography of Adolf Hitler 1 Toland tried to write history as a straightforward narrative, with minimal analysis or judgment This method may have stemmed from his original goal of becoming a playwright In the summers between his college years, he travelled with hobos and wrote several plays with hobos as central characters, none of which achieved the stage 2 At one point he managed to publish an article on dirigibles in Look magazine it proved extremely popular and led to his career as a historian.One exception to his general approach is his Infamy Pearl Harbor and Its Aftermath about the Pearl Harbor attack and the investigations of it, in which he wrote about evidence that President Franklin Roosevelt knew in advance of plans to attack the naval base but remained silent The book was widely criticized at the time Since the original publication, Toland added new evidence and rebutted early critics Also, an anonymous source, known as Seaman Z Robert D Ogg has since come forth to publicly tell his story.Perhaps his most important work, for which he won the Pulitzer Prize in 1971, is The Rising Sun Based on original and extensive interviews with high Japanese officials who survived the war, the book chronicles Imperial Japan from the military rebellion of February 1936 to the end of World War II The book won the Pulitzer because it was the first book in English to tell the history of the war in the Pacific from the Japanese point of view, rather than from an American perspective.The stories of the battles for the stepping stones to Japan, the islands in the Pacific which had come under Japanese domination, are told from the perspective of the commander sitting in his cave rather than from that of the heroic forces engaged in the assault Most of these commanders committed suicide at the conclusion of the battle, but Toland was able to reconstruct their viewpoint from letters to their wives and from reports they sent to Tokyo Toland died in 2004 of pneumonia.While predominantly a non fiction author, Toland also wrote two historical novels, Gods of War and Occupation He says in his autobiography that he earned little money from his Pulitzer Prize winning, The Rising Sun, but was set for life from the earnings of his biography of Hitler, for which he also did original research.http en.wikipedia.org wiki John_Tol



10 thoughts on “Infamy: Pearl Harbor and its Aftermath

  1. Jack Jack says:

    Were we surprised by the attack on Pearl HarborNo Were we surprised by the damage it didyes I read this book starting December 7th The 75th anniversary of the attack How fitting a day to start a book The day of World War II for the United States We knew the Kido Butai had set sail We had cracked all their codes We heard their radio dispatches Our allies even warned us based off of their intelligence Best to let t


  2. Nahid Naghshbandi Nahid Naghshbandi says:


  3. Erik Graff Erik Graff says:

    This book is not much about the Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbor It is about the several hearings about who was responsible for U.S military on the island being unprepared for the attack.The mainstream view is that army commander Short and naval commander Kimmel, as well as their commands in the Army and Navy, were genuinely surprised, such indications of Japanese intentions as were known having been tied up, lost or mis


  4. Jill Hutchinson Jill Hutchinson says:

    The accepted theory of the surprise attack by the Japanese on Pearl Harbor which plunged the US into WWII, is that it indeed was a surprise Pulitzer Prize winner John Toland tells us that it may not have been exactly as we have believed all these years and that the hierarchy in Washington, including President Roosevelt, were aware it was coming and did not warn the Pearl Harbor Army and Navy commanders, Short and Kimmel.Toland has done


  5. David David says:

    Since I have been reading books about the attack on Pearl Harbor for decades, I was aware of this book, Infamy Pearl Harbor and its Aftermath by John Toland practically since it was published I couldn t remember whether I had already read it And because it was published in 1984, I wondered if it would be worth reading or re reading since so many books have been published since based on newly released information But upon further scrutiny, I rea


  6. Susan Susan says:

    So we all know the basics of Pearl Harbor, right On December 7, 1941, that date that will live in infamy, the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, taking it totally by surprise and killing thousands, and also launching the U.S into World War II.Only, what if that wasn t exactly what happened What if FDR knew that the Japanese would be attacking Pearl Harbor, but didn t pass that information along to the commanders there Why on earth would he do that, you as


  7. Nicholas Bobbitt Nicholas Bobbitt says:

    While Toland does write interestingly, this is another case of revisionist history which seeks to bring up conspiracy and is made of flimsy material I m not interested in finishing it I do feel bad for the families of Kimmel and Short, the two men which Toland attempt to exonerate from being involved in favor of Washington conspiring against Pearl Harbor.


  8. Alex Weronski Alex Weronski says:

    Very in depth book about the true events surrounding the tragedy in Pearl Harbor A must read for any one with an interest in the events around WWII Pearl Harbour could have EASILY been avoided, and it s not as easy as pointing the finger at one person


  9. J.S. J.S. says:

    The December 7, 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor was hardly over before the public began to wonder how the US could have been caught so unawares The Roberts Commission investigation Dec 18, 1941 to Jan 23, 1942 concluded that General Short Army and Admiral Kimmel Navy were derelict in their duty and blamed them But almost immediately questions arose about facts that didn t add up By the end of May, 1946 a total of 9 investigations had taken place with differing and alternating con


  10. Harvey Smith Harvey Smith says:

    Yes, the United States did foresee war with Japan during WWII.Admiral J.O Richardson The admiral said he was going to tell a story that the lieutenant could regard as a parable Assume , Richardson said, you were the leader of the greatest nation in the world, and assume that you saw, in another hemisphere, the development of a power which you regarded, and with reasonable support, as a total threat to Western civilization as you knew it Supposing, however, for various reasons, your c


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *